“How do I know that the child support I am paying is really being used for the benefit of my kids?” This is a question I hear from my bankruptcy clients as well as from Social Security disability clients who are facing the prospect of giving up their lump sum and part of their monthly payments.
One of my blog readers proposes a solution to this dilemma:
Child support should be taken from both parents equally put into a monitored account and a debit card should be given to the custodial parent, all money used with account would be tracked. Nowadays child support is used as a way of getting free money for travels new cars hanging out at the malls and nothing to do with the kids.
Is this solution realistic? Does the man who wrote this have an accurate understanding about the obligations of a custodial parent? What do you think?
Filed under Blog by on Nov 7th, 2009. 2 Comments.
Questions about offsets continue to fill my inbox. This one from Dina asks about a common area of confusion:
Dear Mr. Ginsberg,
I receive SSDI and my son (5 y/o) receives an SSDI auxillary payment. His dad wants to reduce the child support he pays to me dollar for dollar based on the SSDI auxillary monies my son gets every month.
I think I understood from your post on April 2009, that the SSDI Auxillary payments to my son does not offset any child support that I receive from the dad. Did I understand this correctly?
Can you direct me to information that I can provide to my son’s dad’s lawyer that shows him he cannot reduce the dad’s child support to me dollar for dollar based on my son’s auxillary award?
Thank you – you provide an invaluable free service – thank you!
My response: First, I think that the rules on offset depend to a great degree upon the jurisdiction where the support order was issued. Rules about offsets are state law questions and every state has different rules.
Secondly, I believe that the offset would only be applicable if your ex-husband was the one receiving SSDI. The logic of permitting an offset arises from the nature of SSDI benefits. SSDI payments arise from tax contributions that one makes when one is working. In other words, if your ex-husband was the one receiving SSDI, auxiliary SSDI benefits would serve as a substitute for his earning power.
Here, you are the one receiving SSDI based on your work. Your SSDI (partially) replaces your income and your earning power. Why should your ex-husband get the benefit from your contributions into the Social Security system?
Filed under Blog by on Oct 17th, 2009. 1 Comment.
The comments and questions I receive on this site essentially fall into two camps. On one hand, the custodial parents (usually the mom) argue as follows:
Are fathers who fall behind on child support payments always “deadbeat dads?” Some fathers (and their new spouses) argue that the custodial mom can be the villain in child support disputes. But does this attitude fairly contemplate the real life burden of raising children.
Should a custodial parent “cut some slack” to a non-custodial parent who is disabled and unable to work? Child support orders that are based on a father’s pre-disability income will be untenable when the non-custodial dad cannot work. The disabled father may not have the funds to hire a lawyer to go back to court to ask for a modification, and the delinquency balance will grow and grow. As a number of disabled fathers have reported, a child support delinquency resulting from an unexpected medical condition and loss of income can result in a
I regularly warn my clients that child support orders do not grow stale or disappear. Even if the child did not live with the parent awarded custody, the obligation remains as long as the child support order remains in place. If the custodial parent received welfare benefits, the state issuing those benefits may gain the right to collect from the non-custodial parent.
I receive a lot of mail from moms (custodial parents) who express a lot of anger at their ex-husbands (or non-custodial fathers). What do the dads have to say? Here is a comment from a dad who explains how the long disability adjudication process has caused him hardship:
Jonathan’s response:
Social Security may not be much help as privacy rules will most likely prevent them from revealing anything about your ex’s case, even though your child may be eligible for auxiliary benefits (that will be in addition to whatever your ex receives himself).
Jonathan Ginsberg