This past Monday, I ran across an interesting article on msnbc.com entitled “Unable to Pay Child Support, Poor Parents Land Behind Bars.” The gist of this article is that non-custodial parents (usually fathers) who have been out of work are brought before judges on contempt charges without any right to court appointed lawyers, and are ending up in jail for non-payment.
In one case, a 39 year Iraqi war vet living in Georgia, with a 10+ year history of regular payments fell behind when he lost his job 2 years ago. Although now working, the judge would not agree to any payment arrangement and put the delinquent father in jail for 3 months.
Several of these recently incarcerated fathers have filed a class action lawsuit demanding that the state of Georgia provide legal counsel in cases where jail is a possible outcome.
Recently the United States Supreme Court ruled that poor parents are not entitled to court appointed lawyers when facing jail for non-payment of child support so long as state law contains “substantial procedural safeguards” to ensure that those without means to pay are not locked up.
The plaintiffs in the Georgia class action suit are contending that Georgia law does not provide those procedural safeguards.
What do you think? I regularly hear from custodial parents who write to say that the non-custodial parent refuses to work or works for cash. At the same time, it seems counterproductive to put a parent like the Iraqi war vet in jail, thereby causing him to lose his new job, putting him even further behind.
Georgia and other states, of course, have no money, and they will no doubt argue to the courts that they should not be burdened with the cost of court appointed lawyers for child support defendants.
What is a good solution to this type of situation?
Filed under Child Support in the News by on Sep 13th, 2011. 8 Comments.
Were you aware that as a divorced wife or husband, you may be able to qualify for Social Security disability benefits based on your deceased spouse or ex-spouse’s earnings record?
Under Social Security’s rules, you can claim disability benefits based on your deceased husband/wife or ex-husband/wife earnings record if:
- you are at least age 50
- you were married to your ex-spouse for at least 10 years
- your ex-spouse was fully insured for SSDI benefits at the time he/she died
You cannot at this point claim disability benefits on the earnings record of a living ex-spouse.
Several years ago, I was represented a disabled ex-wife of a man who got “remarried” after separating (but not legally divorcing) my client. When we filed for disabled widow’s benefits, Social Security advised us that another “widow” had already been paid.
After proving that my client was disabled medically, I was able to document that my client was also the legal surviving widow and that the other “widow” was in fact not a legal wife. Social Security ended up paying both my client and “the other woman.”
Disabled widow claims can be tricky and usually it makes sense to hire a lawyer to assist you. If you are not fully insured for SSDI benefits yourself or if your SSDI benefit amount is less than that of your deceased spouse/ex-spouse, you will want to make sure that your benefit amounts are properly calculated.
Filed under Disabled Widow's Benefits by on Aug 16th, 2011. Comment.








Jonathan Ginsberg